Property Tax Consultant License Defense Attorney

Property tax consultants in Texas who assist clients with property tax consulting services or provide expert testimony in property tax matters are required to be licensed by the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation (TDLR) under the Property Tax Consultant Occupations Law, codified in Title 7, Chapter 1152 of the Texas Occupations Code. When TDLR's Enforcement Division initiates a complaint, investigation, or formal enforcement action against a licensed property tax consultant, the consequences can include administrative penalties, license suspension, probation, written reprimand, or outright revocation of the license. The Law Offices of Alan Abergel, P.C. (LOAA) defends TDLR-licensed property tax consultants in administrative enforcement proceedings, from the initial investigation stage through hearings before the State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH) and petitions for judicial review in Travis County District Court. LOAA does not represent consumers of property tax consulting services. The firm represents the TDLR-licensed property tax consultants who face regulatory scrutiny. LOAA's practice in this area is limited to civil and administrative defense in TDLR licensing matters and does not include representation in criminal proceedings.

The Property Tax Consultant Occupations Law and TDLR Licensing

The Property Tax Consultant Occupations Law establishes the licensing framework for individuals who perform or supervise others performing property tax consulting services for compensation in Texas. The statute recognizes that property tax consulting involves specialized knowledge of property valuation, appraisal district procedures, protest and appeal processes, and the Texas Property Tax Code, and that the public interest is served by ensuring that individuals who provide these services on a compensated basis meet minimum standards of education, experience, and professional conduct.

Anyone performing or supervising property tax consulting services for compensation as defined under Chapter 1152 is eligible — and in most cases required — to register under the Property Tax Consultant Occupations Law. The statute and TDLR's implementing rules establish specific education and experience requirements that applicants must satisfy to obtain and maintain their registration. These requirements are designed to ensure that licensed property tax consultants possess the technical competence necessary to represent property owners before appraisal review boards, negotiate with appraisal district staff, and provide reliable advice on property tax matters.

There are certain exceptions and exemptions to the registration requirement. Attorneys licensed by the State Bar of Texas, for example, are not required to obtain a separate property tax consultant license to provide property tax consulting services, as their activities fall within the practice of law. Other exemptions may apply depending on the nature of the services provided, the relationship between the consultant and the property owner, and the specific circumstances of the engagement. LOAA provides legal opinions to individuals and businesses that need a definitive analysis of whether a specific business model or service offering requires a TDLR property tax consultant license, helping clients avoid the serious consequences of operating without required licensure or, conversely, the unnecessary cost of obtaining a license that is not legally required.

TDLR Complaint and Investigation Process

TDLR enforcement proceedings begin with a complaint, which may originate from a consumer or other member of the public, or from TDLR's own staff in what are known as "Department complaints." The nature and source of the complaint determine the initial procedural path the matter takes, but all complaints share the potential to escalate into formal enforcement actions with significant consequences for the licensee's career and livelihood.

In consumer and public complaints, TDLR's Enforcement Division sends an opening letter to the person against whom the complaint was filed — the respondent — if that person holds a TDLR license. The case is assigned a complaint number and referred to an investigator for further action. For certain categories of complaints, opening letters are not issued because the nature of the investigation requires a different approach. The investigator interviews the complainant, the respondent, and any pertinent witnesses, either by telephone or in person, and gathers copies of documents relevant to the case. If necessary, the investigator may conduct an on-site investigation of the respondent's place of business or the location where the alleged violation occurred. Once the investigation is complete, the investigator submits a detailed factual report to a prosecuting attorney within TDLR's Enforcement Division.

Department complaints follow a similar general framework, though TDLR has created specialized and abbreviated procedures for certain categories of Department-initiated complaints. These specialized procedures vary by statute but are generally designed to eliminate unnecessary steps and bring the matter to resolution more quickly. Regardless of the complaint source, the prosecuting attorney makes the ultimate determination about how the case will be resolved — a decision that can range from informal closure to full formal enforcement action.

The investigation stage is a critical juncture where the involvement of experienced defense counsel can shape the outcome of the entire matter. A property tax consultant who responds to an investigation without legal guidance may inadvertently make statements, provide documents, or take positions that complicate their defense at later stages of the process. LOAA represents property tax consultants from the earliest stages of TDLR investigations, advising on how to respond to opening letters, preparing clients for investigator interviews, reviewing document requests, and communicating with TDLR's Enforcement Division on the respondent's behalf.

Informal Resolution and Warning Letters

Not every TDLR investigation results in formal enforcement action. After reviewing the investigator's report, the prosecuting attorney may determine that formal enforcement is not warranted due to insufficient evidence, the minor nature of the alleged violation, or other factors that weigh against pursuing the matter further. In these cases, the prosecutor closes the case informally by issuing a closing letter, which ends the matter without any penalty or sanction against the licensee.

The prosecutor may also issue a warning letter to the respondent as an intermediate step between closure and formal enforcement. A warning letter recommends that the licensee come into compliance with the applicable law and serves as notice that TDLR is aware of the conduct at issue. While a warning letter does not impose a formal penalty or sanction, it becomes part of the licensee's regulatory file and may be referenced if the licensee is the subject of future complaints or enforcement actions. A pattern of warning letters can signal to TDLR that the licensee's compliance issues are recurring, potentially influencing the agency's decision to pursue formal enforcement in a subsequent matter.

The firm prepares written responses that address the factual allegations and legal defenses, provide context and mitigating information, and demonstrate the respondent's commitment to compliance. When corrective action is warranted, LOAA assists the client in implementing changes to business practices, documentation, or procedures before the prosecutor makes a final resolution determination, positioning the respondent as a cooperative licensee.

Notice of Alleged Violation and Settlement Negotiations

When the prosecuting attorney determines that formal enforcement action is warranted, TDLR issues a Notice of Alleged Violation (NOAV) to the respondent. The NOAV identifies the specific violations alleged, the administrative penalties sought, and any sanctions proposed against the respondent's license. Administrative penalties are monetary fines paid by the respondent to the State of Texas. Sanctions are actions taken against the license itself and may include suspension, probation, a written reprimand, or revocation. The specific penalties and sanctions applicable to particular violations within the property tax consultant licensing program are set forth in TDLR's Enforcement Plan.

The NOAV may contain a settlement offer, presenting the respondent with an opportunity to resolve the matter through negotiation rather than proceeding to a contested hearing. If the respondent and TDLR reach an agreement, the Executive Director of TDLR issues an Agreed Order that memorializes the terms of the settlement. An Agreed Order typically requires the respondent to take specified actions, which may include paying an administrative penalty, paying restitution to a consumer, completing additional education, providing required documentation to the agency, or modifying business practices. TDLR's Enforcement Division monitors the respondent's compliance with the terms of the Agreed Order until all requirements are satisfied.

LOAA represents property tax consultants in NOAV settlement negotiations, evaluating the strength of TDLR's case, and assessing the respondent's potential exposure at a hearing.

Administrative Hearings Before SOAH

If settlement negotiations do not produce a resolution, the respondent has the right to request a hearing in writing within 20 days after receiving the NOAV. Failure to make a timely hearing request has serious consequences: TDLR may enter a Default Order granting the penalties or sanctions sought in the NOAV without conducting a hearing. A Default Order is issued by the Executive Director of TDLR, and the respondent loses the opportunity to contest the allegations, present evidence, or argue for a reduced penalty.

Once a hearing is requested, the matter is scheduled before the State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH), an independent state agency that provides administrative law judges to hear contested cases involving state agencies. The SOAH hearing functions as a formal adjudicatory proceeding, with both parties presenting evidence, examining and cross-examining witnesses, and making legal arguments. LOAA represents property tax consultants at SOAH hearings, developing the defense strategy, preparing the respondent's testimony, identifying and preparing defense witnesses, assembling documentary evidence, and conducting cross-examination of TDLR's witnesses.

Following the hearing, the SOAH administrative law judge issues a Proposal for Decision (PFD) that contains proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a recommended outcome. The PFD is not the final decision in the case — it is a recommendation to the Commission of Licensing and Regulation, which makes the final determination. All parties are notified of the Commission meeting date at which the PFD will be considered. At the meeting, the respondent and TDLR's attorney are given the opportunity to make arguments to the Commission regarding the PFD. The Commission may adopt the PFD as recommended, modify it, or reject it entirely. After the Commission reaches its final decision, a Final Order is issued to the parties.

Motions for Rehearing and Judicial Review

If the respondent believes that an Order of the Executive Director or an Order of the Commission contains errors, the respondent may file a Motion for Rehearing pursuant to Section 2001.144 of the Texas Government Code. The Motion must be filed no later than the 25th day after the Order is signed. Filing a Motion for Rehearing is not merely an optional step — it is a prerequisite to any further appeal of the Order. A respondent who fails to file a timely Motion for Rehearing forfeits the right to seek judicial review of the agency's decision.

Once a Motion for Rehearing is filed, the Commission may grant the Motion, deny it, or take no action. If the Commission takes no action within 55 days after the Order is signed, the Motion is denied automatically by operation of law. This timeline creates a defined window within which the respondent must prepare for the possibility of further appellate proceedings.

If the Motion for Rehearing is denied — whether by express Commission action or by the automatic denial that occurs when no action is taken — the respondent has 30 days following the denial to file a petition for judicial review in Travis County District Court. Judicial review provides the respondent with an opportunity to challenge the agency's decision before an independent court, arguing that the Commission's Order is not supported by substantial evidence, was made in violation of the respondent's constitutional or statutory rights, or was otherwise arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion. When a petition for judicial review is filed, the agency is represented in District Court by an attorney from the Office of the Texas Attorney General.

LOAA represents property tax consultants through every stage of the post-hearing process, including the preparation and filing of Motions for Rehearing, advocacy before the Commission at rehearing proceedings, and the filing and prosecution of petitions for judicial review in Travis County District Court. The firm understands the strict deadlines that govern each stage of the appellate process and ensures that no procedural misstep deprives the client of their right to challenge an adverse agency decision.

Legal Opinions on Licensing Requirements

The question of whether a particular business model or service offering requires a TDLR property tax consultant license is not always straightforward. Companies and individuals that provide services related to property taxes — such as data analytics firms that supply valuation information, technology platforms that facilitate the protest process, or consultants who provide advice on property tax planning without directly representing property owners before appraisal review boards — may or may not fall within the scope of the Property Tax Consultant Occupations Law depending on the specific nature of the services they provide and the manner in which they are delivered.

LOAA provides legal opinions to individuals and businesses that need a definitive analysis of whether their activities require a TDLR property tax consultant license. These opinions involve a detailed examination of the services provided, the compensation structure, the relationship between the service provider and the property owner, and the specific statutory definitions and exemptions. A well-reasoned legal opinion provides the client with a documented basis for its compliance position and can serve as evidence of good faith in the event of a future TDLR inquiry about whether the client's activities constitute unlicensed practice.

For companies developing new service models or expanding into Texas, obtaining a legal opinion before launching operations can prevent the significant consequences of operating without required licensure, which can include TDLR enforcement action, administrative penalties, and the inability to collect fees for services rendered without a license. Conversely, the opinion may confirm that the client's activities fall outside the licensing requirement, sparing the client the unnecessary time and expense of obtaining a license that is not legally required for their particular business model.

What Our Clients Say

Contact Us:



PRINCIPAL OFFICE

600 West 6th Street Floor 4 Fort Worth, TX 76102 Phone: 817-304-9540 E-mail: alan@abergellaw.com